Engel v. Gerstenfeld
184 A.D. 953
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1918·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Order of the Appellate Term reversed, with costs, and judgment of the Municipal Court unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the evidence did not warrant the Appellate Term in deciding that the treatment administered by plaintiff constituted the practice of medicine, within the statutory definition thereof.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Engel v. Gerstenfeld, 184 A.D. 953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).
184 A.D. 953 (Engel v. Gerstenfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Rubin
113 Misc. 2d 117 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Amber
76 Misc. 2d 267 (New York Supreme Court, 1973)
People v. Maybrook
276 A.D.2d 192 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Rickman v. Terminal Barber Shops, Inc.
180 Misc. 319 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
People v. Lehrman
251 A.D. 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)