Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Engel v. Gerstenfeld

Engel v. Gerstenfeld

184 A.D. 953
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 184 A.D. 953 (Engel v. Gerstenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Engel v. Gerstenfeld, 184 A.D. 953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Order of the Appellate Term reversed, with costs, and judgment of the Municipal Court unanimously affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the evidence did not warrant the Appellate Term in deciding that the treatment administered by plaintiff constituted the practice of medicine, within the statutory definition thereof.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rubin
113 Misc. 2d 117 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
People v. Amber
76 Misc. 2d 267 (New York Supreme Court, 1973)
People v. Maybrook
276 A.D.2d 192 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Rickman v. Terminal Barber Shops, Inc.
180 Misc. 319 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
People v. Lehrman
251 A.D. 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 A.D. 953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engel-v-gerstenfeld-nyappdiv-1918.