Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Engel v. Finkelstein

Engel v. Finkelstein

275 A.D.2d 779
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 11, 1949
StatusPublished

This text of 275 A.D.2d 779 (Engel v. Finkelstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Engel v. Finkelstein, 275 A.D.2d 779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

Opinion

In our opinion there was substantial proof before the commission to warrant the finding that appellant created the hardship which she has urged as her compelling necessity. Under such circumstances the commission’s denial of the application for a certificate of eviction was a proper exercise of its discretion which the courts may not disturb. (Matter of Gardella v. Ross, 274 App. Div. 889; Matter of Clemente v. Finkelstein, 274 App. Div. 1069; Matter of Marburg v. Cole, 286 N. Y. 202, 208; Matter of Mounting & Finishing Co. v. McGoldrick, 294 N. Y. 104, 108.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Mounting Finishing Co. v. McGoldrick
60 N.E.2d 825 (New York Court of Appeals, 1945)
Matter of Marburg v. Cole
36 N.E.2d 113 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)
Gardella v. Ross
274 A.D. 889 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1948)
Clemente v. Finkelstein
274 A.D. 1069 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
275 A.D.2d 779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engel-v-finkelstein-nyappdiv-1949.