Engel v. City of Milwaukee

149 N.W. 141, 158 Wis. 480, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 331
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 27, 1914
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 149 N.W. 141 (Engel v. City of Milwaukee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Engel v. City of Milwaukee, 149 N.W. 141, 158 Wis. 480, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 331 (Wis. 1914).

Opinion

KeewiN, J.

The facts are fully set out in the complaint, from which it appears that the injury complained of was caused by the negligence of an employee of the defendant city while engaged in the department of fire and police alarm system of the defendant city, authorized by sec. 959 — ■ 46d, Stats., in running' an automobile used in such service so negligently as to cause the injury set forth in the complaint.

The only question in the case is whether the defendant city is liable for injuries caused through the negligence of an employee of the defendant while engaged in performing the services alleged. There is no doubt but that the duties which the employee was performing for the defendant city at the time of the accident were public or governmental duties. It is settled by the decisions of this court that a city is not liable for the negligence of one in its employ while engaged in the performance of a public or governmental function. Hayes v. Oshkosh, 33 Wis. 314; Manske v. Milwaukee, 123 Wis. 172, 101 N. W. 377; Kuehn v. Milwaukee, 92 Wis. 263, 65 N. W. 1030; Higgins v. Superior, 134 Wis. 264, 114 N. W. 490; Kempster v. Milwaukee, 103 Wis. 421, 79 N. W. 411; Folk v. Milwaukee, 108 Wis. 359, 84 N. W. 420; Liermann v. Milwaukee, 132 Wis. 628, 113 N. W. 65.

The facts alleged in the complaint bring the present case within the rule of the foregoing decisions, therefore the complaint states no cause of action.

By the Court. — The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duncan v. Ehrhard
461 N.W.2d 822 (Court of Appeals of Wisconsin, 1990)
Eulrich v. City of Clintonville
300 N.W. 219 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1941)
Jorgenson v. City of Sparta
271 N.W. 926 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1937)
Boldig v. Urban Telephone Co.
271 N.W. 88 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1937)
Crowley v. Clark County
261 N.W. 221 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1935)
Schumacher v. City of Milwaukee
243 N.W. 756 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1932)
Harding v. City of Hawthorne
300 P. 42 (California Court of Appeal, 1931)
Leckliter v. City of Des Moines
233 N.W. 58 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1930)
Rollow v. Ogden City
243 P. 791 (Utah Supreme Court, 1926)
Highway Trailer Co. v. Janesville Electric Co.
190 N.W. 110 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1922)
Sutter v. Milwaukee Board of Fire Underwriters
160 N.W. 57 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1917)
Morrison v. Fisher
152 N.W. 475 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1915)
Apfelbacher v. State
152 N.W. 144 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1915)
Bernstein v. City of Milwaukee
149 N.W. 382 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 N.W. 141, 158 Wis. 480, 1914 Wisc. LEXIS 331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engel-v-city-of-milwaukee-wis-1914.