Engel v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.
This text of 252 A.D. 792 (Engel v. Brooklyn & Queens Transit Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant railroad company appeals from a judgment, entered upon a verdict of a jury, in favor of the plaintiff for damages for personal injuries sustained by him, a passenger in defendant’s trolley car, through his stepping from that car into a depression in the street, the edge of which nearest the track was not less than twenty-four nor more than twenty-five inches from the outside rail thereof. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Although respondent failed to show appellant’s alleged negligence, based upon the latter’s claimed failure to perform the duty imposed by Railroad Law, section 178, nevertheless the evidence presented a question of fact for the jury as to appellant’s alleged negligence in failing to furnish to the plaintiff, its passenger, a reasonably safe place to alight. The verdict finds ample support in the evidence. The record discloses no errors on the part of the trial justice. Present — Hagarty, Carswell, Davis, Adel and Taylor, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 792, 299 N.Y.S. 186, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6309, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engel-v-brooklyn-queens-transit-corp-nyappdiv-1937.