Engel v. Breitkreitz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Engel v. Breitkreitz

40 N.W. 519, 39 Minn. 423, 1888 Minn. LEXIS 148

DecidedNovember 20, 1888

StatusPublished

This text of 40 N.W. 519 (Engel v. Breitkreitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Engel v. Breitkreitz, 40 N.W. 519, 39 Minn. 423, 1888 Minn. LEXIS 148 (Mich. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court.

Adopting the most favorable view possible of plaintiff’s ease, as presented by the transcript herein, he cannot complain of the manner in which the main question, that of defendants’ negligence, was submitted for the determination of the jury. It was a question of fact, to be passed upon under proper instructions from the court. It was fairly submitted to the jurors, and by them decided adversely to plaintiff. As has been held repeatedly, this court cannot interfere.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court.

Adopting the most favorable view possible of plaintiff’s ease, as presented by the transcript herein, he cannot complain of the manner in which the main question, that of defendants’ negligence, was submitted for the determination of the jury. It was a question of fact, to be passed upon under proper instructions from the court. It was fairly submitted to the jurors, and by them decided adversely to plaintiff. As has been held repeatedly, this court cannot interfere.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 N.W. 519, 39 Minn. 423, 1888 Minn. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/engel-v-breitkreitz-minn-1888.