Eneman v. Richter

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Eneman v. Richter

589 N.W.2d 414, 224 Wis. 2d 258, 1999 Wisc. LEXIS 14

Wisconsin Supreme Court·Decided March 3, 1999·No. Nos. 96-2893, 96-2895, 96-2916, 96-2917, 96-2937, 96-2938, 96-2939·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the decision of [262] the court of appeals. Justice Donald W. Steinmetz, Justice William A. Bablitch, and Justice Jon P. Wilcox would affirm; Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, Justice N. Patrick Crooks, and Justice David T. Prosser would reverse. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson did not participate.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

¶ 1. The court is equally divided on whether to affirm or reverse the decision of [262] the court of appeals. Justice Donald W. Steinmetz, Justice William A. Bablitch, and Justice Jon P. Wilcox would affirm; Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, Justice N. Patrick Crooks, and Justice David T. Prosser would reverse. Chief Justice Shirley S. Abrahamson did not participate.

¶ 2. Accordingly, the decision of the court of appeals is affirmed.

Eneman v. Richter, 589 N.W.2d 414, 224 Wis. 2d 258, 1999 Wisc. LEXIS 14 (Wis. 1999).

Pincite

589 N.W.2d 414 (Eneman v. Richter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related