Endurance American Insurance Company v. Division 16 Construction Corp.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedApril 23, 2021
Docket1:20-cv-08362
StatusUnknown

This text of Endurance American Insurance Company v. Division 16 Construction Corp. (Endurance American Insurance Company v. Division 16 Construction Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Endurance American Insurance Company v. Division 16 Construction Corp., (S.D.N.Y. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

ENDURANCE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, 20-CV-8362 (JPO)

-v- ORDER

DIVISION 16 CONSTRUCTION CORP., et al., Defendants.

J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: On April 5, 2021, Defendant Juan Hernandez Jr. filed a pro se appearance and answer in this case, ostensibly on behalf of himself and Defendant Amy A. Hernandez. (Dkt. No. 25; Dkt. No. 26.) And on April 16, 2021, Juan Hernandez Jr. filed a second pro se appearance and answer, this time on behalf of Defendant Division 16 Construction Corporation. (Dkt. No. 28; Dkt. No. 29.) 28 U.S.C. § 1654 “does not permit unlicensed laymen to represent anyone else other than themselves.” Lattanzio v. COMTA, 481 F.3d 137, 139 (2d Cir. 2007) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Generally, unlicensed family members may not represent one another. Iannaccone v. Law, 142 F.3d 553, 558 (2d Cir. 1998) (“[A] lay person may not . . . appear on behalf of his or her own minor child”). Furthermore, “a layperson may not represent . . . a corporation.” Lattanzio, 481 F.3d at 139; see also Omega Consulting v. Farrington Mfg. Co., 604 F. Supp. 2d 684, 685 (S.D.N.Y. 2009). It follows that proper appearances have not been entered on behalf of Amy A. Hernandez or Division 16 Construction Corporation. Amy A. Hernandez is directed to obtain counsel or make a pro se appearance on her own behalf. Division 16 Construction Corporation is directed to obtain counsel. Amy A. Hernandez or her counsel, as well as counsel for Division 16 Construction Corporation, shall file an appearance and answer on or before May 4, 2021. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Defendants Amy A. Hernandez and Division 16 Construction Corporation.

SO ORDERED. Dated: April 23, 2021 New York, New York

| J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Omega Consulting v. FARRINGTON MANUFACTURING COMPANY
604 F. Supp. 2d 684 (S.D. New York, 2009)
Iannaccone v. Law
142 F.3d 553 (Second Circuit, 1998)
Lattanzio v. Comta
481 F.3d 137 (Second Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Endurance American Insurance Company v. Division 16 Construction Corp., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/endurance-american-insurance-company-v-division-16-construction-corp-nysd-2021.