Endsley v. International Business Machines Corp.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Endsley v. International Business Machines Corp.

342 S.E.2d 308, 255 Ga. 694

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedApril 23, 1986

Docket43159

StatusPublished

This text of 342 S.E.2d 308 (Endsley v. International Business Machines Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Endsley v. International Business Machines Corp., 342 S.E.2d 308, 255 Ga. 694 (Ga. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

Per curiam.

Oliver H. Endsley III sued International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) praying for an injunction restraining the withholding of money from his salary to satisfy a claim of the Internal Revenue Service for delinquent taxes. The trial court granted IBM’s motion to dismiss holding that the state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction because of 26 USC § 7421. Upon review of the record and arguments, we find the trial court to be correct.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per curiam.

Oliver H. Endsley III sued International Business Machines Corporation (IBM) praying for an injunction restraining the withholding of money from his salary to satisfy a claim of the Internal Revenue Service for delinquent taxes. The trial court granted IBM’s motion to dismiss holding that the state courts lack subject matter jurisdiction because of 26 USC § 7421. Upon review of the record and arguments, we find the trial court to be correct.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 S.E.2d 308, 255 Ga. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/endsley-v-international-business-machines-corp-ga-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack