Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Endresz v. Friedberg

Endresz v. Friedberg

28 A.D.2d 1085, 285 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3134
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 31, 1967
StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.D.2d 1085 (Endresz v. Friedberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Endresz v. Friedberg, 28 A.D.2d 1085, 285 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Memorandum: Permission to plead over and assert causes of action which might be had under the theory of Ferrara v. GallucMo {supra) is meaningless and futile inasmuch as there can be no sufficient causes of action under the facts here present under the theory of the Ferrara case, or otherwise. (Appeal and cross appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term, dismissing certain cause of action for negligence.) Present — Williams, P. J., Henry, Del Veechio and Marsh, JJ. [52 Misc 2d 693.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Endresz v. Friedberg
52 Misc. 2d 693 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 A.D.2d 1085, 285 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/endresz-v-friedberg-nyappdiv-1967.