Endresz v. Friedberg

28 A.D.2d 1085, 285 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3134

Opinion

Memorandum: Permission to plead over and assert causes of action which might be had under the theory of Ferrara v. GallucMo {supra) is meaningless and futile inasmuch as there can be no sufficient causes of action under the facts here present under the theory of the Ferrara case, or otherwise. (Appeal and cross appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term, dismissing certain cause of action for negligence.) Present — Williams, P. J., Henry, Del Veechio and Marsh, JJ. [52 Misc 2d 693.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Endresz v. Friedberg, 28 A.D.2d 1085, 285 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3134 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

28 A.D.2d 1085 (Endresz v. Friedberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Endresz v. Friedberg
52 Misc. 2d 693 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)