Endotach LLC v. Medtronic, Inc.
This text of Endotach LLC v. Medtronic, Inc. (Endotach LLC v. Medtronic, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ENDOTACH LLC, Appellant
v.
MEDTRONIC, INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC., Appellees ______________________
2015-1784 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014- 00100. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
JONATHAN TAD SUDER, Friedman, Suder & Cooke, Fort Worth, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by BRETT MICHAEL PINKUS; MATTHEW CARMINE PHILLIPS, Renaissance IP Law Group LLP, Portland, OR.
KEVIN GOLDMAN, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellees. Also repre- sented by MARK CHRISTOPHER FLEMING; JACK S. BARUFKA, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, McLean, VA; EVAN FINKEL, Los Angeles, CA. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 6, 2016 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Endotach LLC v. Medtronic, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/endotach-llc-v-medtronic-inc-cafc-2016.