Endicott v. Glynn County
221 S.E.2d 431, 235 Ga. 667, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 963
Opinion
1. This appeal is from the denial of a motion to vacate an interlocutory order directing the appellant
. . to remove an existing fence in an easement alley...” Appellant in his brief states the fence has been removed. Therefore, issues raised here questioning the validity of the order are moot.
2. Appellant has served his sentence for contempt and issues as to the validity of that order are moot. Cagle v. PMC Development Co., 227 Ga. 309 (180 SE2d 545) (1971).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Endicott v. Glynn County, 221 S.E.2d 431, 235 Ga. 667, 1975 Ga. LEXIS 963 (Ga. 1975).
221 S.E.2d 431 (Endicott v. Glynn County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Kendall
469 S.E.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Oak Creek Development Corp. v. Hartline-Thomas, Inc.
225 S.E.2d 515 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1976)
Citizens to Save Paulding County v. City of Atlanta
223 S.E.2d 101 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)