Endicott v. Commissioner of Social Security

S.D. Illinois

Endicott v. Commissioner of Social Security

DecidedAugust 4, 2025

Docket3:25-cv-00001

StatusUnknown

This text of Endicott v. Commissioner of Social Security (Endicott v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Endicott v. Commissioner of Social Security, (S.D. Ill. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

PEGGY S. ENDICOTT,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 25-CV-00001-SPM

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES McGLYNN, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) [hereinafter EAJA] filed by Plaintiff Endicott and the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. 22). The parties agreed to a stipulated award of $5,221.60 in the Joint Motion (see id.). The Court finds that Plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to an award of attorney fees pursuant to the EAJA. The Court further finds that the amount sought is reasonable and appropriate. This award shall fully and completely satisfy any and all claims for fees and expenses that may have been payable to Plaintiff in this matter pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Per the parties’ agreement, this motion does not include Plaintiff’s costs, and Plaintiff may file a separate bill of costs. The parties’ Joint Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 22) is GRANTED. The Court awards Plaintiff attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $5,221.60 (five thousand two hundred twenty-one dollars and sixty cents). The amount awarded is payable to Plaintiff and is subject to set-off for any debt owed by Plaintiff to the United States in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). See also Harrington v. Berryhill, 906 F.3d 561 (7th Cir. 2018). However, any part of the award that is not subject to set-off to pay Plaintiff’s pre-

existing debt to the United States shall be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment executed by Plaintiff. If Defendant can verify that Plaintiff does not owe a pre-existing debt to the government subject to the offset, Defendant will direct that the award be made payable to Joseph Ira Frydman pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff. If payment is mailed, as compared to electronically deposited, it shall be mailed to counsel’s address of record:

1700 Reisterstown Road, Suite 202 Baltimore, MD 21208

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 4, 2025

s/ Stephen P. McGlynn STEPHEN P. McGLYNN U.S. District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

PEGGY S. ENDICOTT,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 25-CV-00001-SPM

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. ORDER FOR ATTORNEY FEES McGLYNN, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on a Joint Motion for Attorney Fees Pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) [hereinafter EAJA] filed by Plaintiff Endicott and the Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Doc. 22). The parties agreed to a stipulated award of $5,221.60 in the Joint Motion (see id.). The Court finds that Plaintiff is the prevailing party and is entitled to an award of attorney fees pursuant to the EAJA. The Court further finds that the amount sought is reasonable and appropriate. This award shall fully and completely satisfy any and all claims for fees and expenses that may have been payable to Plaintiff in this matter pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Per the parties’ agreement, this motion does not include Plaintiff’s costs, and Plaintiff may file a separate bill of costs. The parties’ Joint Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 22) is GRANTED. The Court awards Plaintiff attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $5,221.60 (five thousand two hundred twenty-one dollars and sixty cents). The amount awarded is payable to Plaintiff and is subject to set-off for any debt owed by Plaintiff to the United States in accordance with Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). See also Harrington v. Berryhill, 906 F.3d 561 (7th Cir. 2018). However, any part of the award that is not subject to set-off to pay Plaintiff’s pre-

existing debt to the United States shall be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney pursuant to the EAJA assignment executed by Plaintiff. If Defendant can verify that Plaintiff does not owe a pre-existing debt to the government subject to the offset, Defendant will direct that the award be made payable to Joseph Ira Frydman pursuant to the EAJA assignment duly signed by Plaintiff. If payment is mailed, as compared to electronically deposited, it shall be mailed to counsel’s address of record:

1700 Reisterstown Road, Suite 202 Baltimore, MD 21208

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: August 4, 2025

s/ Stephen P. McGlynn STEPHEN P. McGLYNN U.S. District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Endicott v. Commissioner of Social Security, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/endicott-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ilsd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack