Endia Smith v. SCIL Texas LLC, Dba Speedy Cash

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 13, 2025·No. 01-25-00311-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued November 13, 2025

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(c). Further, although appellant failed to include a certificate

of conference in their motion, appellant’s motion includes a certificate of service,

more than 10 days have passed since the motion was filed, and no party has

responded to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a).

Accordingly, we reinstate the appeal, grant the motion, and dismiss the

appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as

moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Morgan and Dokupil.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Endia Smith v. SCIL Texas LLC, Dba Speedy Cash, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Endia Smith v. SCIL Texas LLC, Dba Speedy Cash (Endia Smith v. SCIL Texas LLC, Dba Speedy Cash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.