Enders v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.

Fourth Circuit

Enders v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.

362 F. App'x 352

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 25, 2010·No. No. 09-1852·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew Enders appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Appellees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Enders v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., Nos. 1:08-cv-03211-JFM; 1:08-cv-03042-JFM, 2009 WL 2134344 (D.Md. July 16, 2009). We deny as moot Enders’ motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Matthew Enders appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Appellees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Enders v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., Nos. 1:08-cv-03211-JFM; 1:08-cv-03042-JFM, 2009 WL 2134344 (D.Md. July 16, 2009). We deny as moot Enders’ motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Enders v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc., 362 F. App'x 352 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

362 F. App'x 352 (Enders v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.