Enders v. Cravedi

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-1492

MICHAEL ENDERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KATHLEEN CRAVEDI,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA- 03-245-PJM)

Submitted: November 18, 2004 Decided: November 23, 2004

Before LUTTIG and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Enders, Appellant Pro Se. Allan A. Noble, BUDOW & NOBLE, P.C., Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael Enders appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his civil action, denying his motion for

reconsideration, and awarding attorney’s fees to Kathleen Cravedi.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Enders v. Cravedi, No. CA-03-245-PJM (D. Md. filed

Oct. 21, 2003 & entered Oct. 22, 2003; filed Jan. 15, 2004 &

entered Jan. 16, 2004; Mar. 10, 2004). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -