Encyclopedia Britannica Co. v. American Newspaper Ass'n

142 F. 966, 74 C.C.A. 228, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3692
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided January 24, 1906·No. No. 43·Published

Opinion

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

The decree dismissing the bill of complaint in this case was right, and we adopt as our own the opinion by which it was vindicated in the court below. Encyclopedia Co. v. Werner (C. C.) 135 Fed. 841. The learned judge appropriately and correctly applied to the construction of the provisions of the Interim Copyright Act of January 7, 1904, c. 2, 33 Stat. 4, upon which the appellant relied, the familiar rule “that a thing may be within the [967]*967letter of the statute, and yet not within the statute, because not within its spirit, nor within the intention of its makers.” Holy Trinity Church v. United States, 143 U. S. 457, 12 Sup. Ct. 511, 36 L. Ed. 226; Rothschild v. Adler-Weinberger S. S. Co., 130 Fed. 866, 65 C. C. A. 350.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Encyclopedia Britannica Co. v. American Newspaper Ass'n, 142 F. 966, 74 C.C.A. 228, 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 3692 (3d Cir. 1906).

142 F. 966 (Encyclopedia Britannica Co. v. American Newspaper Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States
143 U.S. 457 (Supreme Court, 1892)
Rothschild v. Adler-Weinberger S. S. Co.
130 F. 866 (Third Circuit, 1904)
Encyclopædia Britannica Co. v. Werner Co.
135 F. 841 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey, 1905)