Encore Videos, Inc. v. City of San Antonio
352 F.3d 938, 2003 WL 22870076
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Encore Videos, Inc. v. City of San Antonio. Read the opinion of the Court — 330 F.3d 288 →
Opinion
We clarify our opinion, 330 F.3d 288, by stating the following: The opinion does not overrule SDJ, Inc. v. City of Houston, 837 F.2d 1268 (5th Cir.1988). Indeed, no panel has the power to overrule the opinion of a previous panel. Patterson v. Mobil Oil Corp., 335 F.3d 476, 485 (5th Cir.2003). In addition, the ordinance at issue was found not to be narrowly tailored because of both its failure to make an on-site/off-site distinction and its low 20% inventory requirement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Encore Videos, Inc. v. City of San Antonio, 352 F.3d 938, 2003 WL 22870076 (5th Cir. 2003).
352 F.3d 938 (Encore Videos, Inc. v. City of San Antonio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Patterson v. Mobil Oil Corp.
335 F.3d 476 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
Sdj, Inc., D/B/A Sugar Babes v. The City of Houston
837 F.2d 1268 (Fifth Circuit, 1988)
Encore Videos, Inc. v. City of San Antonio
330 F.3d 288 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)