Encore, Inc. v. Olivetti Corp. of America
This text of 291 So. 2d 27 (Encore, Inc. v. Olivetti Corp. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants, defendants in the trial court, have instituted these appeals, seeking review of various orders entered by the trial judge, including adverse summary judgments for arrearages in installment payments under a conditional sales contract and for repossession of the equipment sold by the plaintiff to defendants. The appeals have been consolidated.
We have considered the record, the points raised in all of the briefs, and arguments of counsel in the light of the controlling principles of law, and have concluded that reversible error has been shown only with respect to the trial court’s order finding defendant, Melvin Factor, in contempt and ordering his arrest.
The record reveals that this order was entered on September 28, 1972 at a time when the proceedings were automatically stayed by virtue of appellants’ petition for a writ of certiorari in the Florida Supreme Court. See F.A.R. 4.5(c)(6), 32 F.S.A. Therefore, we do not think a contempt order based upon the defendant’s failure to comply with the court’s order of September 12, 1972, as amended September 22, 1972, was proper.
In all other respects, the judgments and orders appealed are affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
291 So. 2d 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/encore-inc-v-olivetti-corp-of-america-fladistctapp-1974.