Encarnacion Aguilar v. Dwight Neven

424 F. App'x 620
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMarch 23, 2011
Docket09-17347
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 424 F. App'x 620 (Encarnacion Aguilar v. Dwight Neven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Encarnacion Aguilar v. Dwight Neven, 424 F. App'x 620 (9th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM *

Encarnación Aguilar (“Aguilar”) appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. He argues that, in violation of the Sixth Amendment, he was denied a speedy trial. We affirm, for the reasons stated by the district court.

Aguilar also seeks a certificate of appealability (“COA”) regarding whether his appellate counsel was ineffective in failing to argue the indictment was untimely. We deny the COA, for the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED and DENIED.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Aguilar v. Neven
181 L. Ed. 2d 135 (Supreme Court, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
424 F. App'x 620, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/encarnacion-aguilar-v-dwight-neven-ca9-2011.