Encalarde v. New Orleans Center for Creative Arts/Riverfront

158 So. 3d 826, 2015 La. LEXIS 353, 2015 WL 894595
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 13, 2015
DocketNo. 2014-CC-2430
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 158 So. 3d 826 (Encalarde v. New Orleans Center for Creative Arts/Riverfront) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Encalarde v. New Orleans Center for Creative Arts/Riverfront, 158 So. 3d 826, 2015 La. LEXIS 353, 2015 WL 894595 (La. 2015).

Opinion

In re State of Louisiana through the New Orleans Center for Creative Arts;— Defendant; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court Div. A, No. 2009-01902; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2014-C-0925.

Granted. In order to bring an action under La. R.S. 23:967, the employee must establish the employer engaged in workplace conduct constituting an actual violation of state law. See Accardo v. Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company, 05-2377 (La.App. 1 Cir. 6/21/06), 943 So.2d 381; Hale v. Touro Infirmary, 04-0003 (La.App. 4 Cir.11/3/04), 886 So.2d 1210, writ denied, [827]*82705-0103 (La.3/24/05), 896 So.2d 1036. Plaintiff has failed to present any evidence indicating relator engaged in any conduct which would constitute a “violation of state law” for purposes of La. R.S. 23:967(A)(1). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and summary judgment is granted in relator’s favor.

JOHNSON, C.J., and HUGHES, J., would deny.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 So. 3d 826, 2015 La. LEXIS 353, 2015 WL 894595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/encalarde-v-new-orleans-center-for-creative-artsriverfront-la-2015.