Encalada v. SMJ Environmental, Inc.

55 A.D.3d 1161, 865 N.Y.S.2d 581

This text of 55 A.D.3d 1161 (Encalada v. SMJ Environmental, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Encalada v. SMJ Environmental, Inc., 55 A.D.3d 1161, 865 N.Y.S.2d 581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Malone Jr., J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed October 19, 2006, which, among other things, ruled that an employer-employee relationship existed between claimant and SMJ Environmental, Inc.

The current case involves the identical alleged employers and workers’ compensation carriers as in Matter of Jara v SMJ Envtl., Inc. (55 AD3d 1157 [2008] [decided herewith]). Although this case concerns a different claimant, the issues of the existence of an employment relationship and the scope of workers’ compensation coverage raised herein are the same as those presented in Matter of Jara. For the reasons set forth in that case, we affirm the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, which determined that claimant was employed by SMJ Environmental, Inc. and that Clarendon National Insurance, as the reinsurer of Frontier Insurance Company, is the liable workers’ compensation carrier.

[1162]*1162Mercure, J.P., Spain, Carpinello and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jara v. SMJ Environmental, Inc.
55 A.D.3d 1157 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.D.3d 1161, 865 N.Y.S.2d 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/encalada-v-smj-environmental-inc-nyappdiv-2008.