Enbridge Energy v. Michigan Tax Tribunal

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 4, 2008·No. 135722·Published

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

June 4, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

135722 & (3)(4)(8)(9) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan ENBRIDGE ENERGY, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Robert P. Young, Jr. Plaintiff, Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 135722 MTT: 0301679 MICHIGAN TAX TRIBUNAL, Defendant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control is considered, and it is DISMISSED. Const 1963, art 6, § 4 grants this Court general superintending control over “courts,” not over administrative agencies of the executive branch of government. The motion for stay is DENIED. The motions for miscellaneous relief are GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 4, 2008 _________________________________________ t0528 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Enbridge Energy v. Michigan Tax Tribunal, (Mich. 2008).

Enbridge Energy v. Michigan Tax Tribunal (Enbridge Energy v. Michigan Tax Tribunal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.