Enbok Rhee v. Wong

15 A.D.3d 319, 790 N.Y.S.2d 111, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1931

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered January 15, 2004, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendant Lovell’s cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs seek recovery for personal injuries sustained in a three-car accident. It is alleged that Lovell’s automobile was struck by a hit-and-run driver and that plaintiffs’ vehicle came to a stop behind Lovell’s, and was then struck from the rear by defendant Wong’s vehicle, driving it into Lovell’s. The court denied summary relief sought by each of the parties, and only Lovell appeals. Triable issues of fact exist, including the reasonableness of Lovell’s failure to pull to the side of the road after being struck by the nonparty hit-and-run driver (Bertrand v Vingan, 249 AD2d 13 [1998]). Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Enbok Rhee v. Wong, 15 A.D.3d 319, 790 N.Y.S.2d 111, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1931 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

15 A.D.3d 319 (Enbok Rhee v. Wong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bertrand v. Vingan
249 A.D.2d 13 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)