Enander v. Kelly
This text of 306 A.D.2d 41 (Enander v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Determination of respondent Police Commissioner, dated December 28, 2001, dismissing petitioner from his position as a police officer, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Paviola Soto, J.], entered September 17, 2002), dismissed, without costs.
The finding that petitioner used excessive force in making an arrest is supported by substantial evidence, including the hearsay testimony of a Police Department investigator relating statements by eyewitnesses that petitioner viciously beat the nonresisting complainant about the head with a radio or flashlight, and unrefuted medical testimony that the complainant’s surgically repaired multiple facial and skull fractures were consistent with multiple blows to the head and inconsistent with a fall (see Matter of LaFemina v Brown, 194 AD2d 405 [1993]). No basis exists to disturb respondent’s finding of credibility rejecting petitioner’s claim that the complainant sustained his injuries when he fell once off a curb during the police chase (see Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436, 443-444 [1987]). Petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim is improperly raised for the first time in reply papers (see Ritt v Lenox Hill Hosp., 182 AD2d 560 [1992]), and, in any event, assuming there is a right to counsel in this type of proceeding, lacks support in the record. The penalty of dismissal does not shock our sense of fairness (see Matter of Harp v New York City Police Dept., 96 NY2d 892 [2001]), particularly in view of the recent discipline of petitioner in another matter for excessive force resulting in injury. Concur — Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Saxe, Williams and Marlow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
306 A.D.2d 41, 760 N.Y.S.2d 480, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/enander-v-kelly-nyappdiv-2003.