En Xin Wu v. U.S. Attorney General
This text of En Xin Wu v. U.S. Attorney General (En Xin Wu v. U.S. Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FILED FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 No. 04-12895 THOMAS K. KAHN CLERK
BIA No. A79-432-956
EN XIN WU,
Petitioner,
versus
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
(September 30, 3005)
Before TJOFLAT and BARKETT, Circuit Judges and FULLER*, Chief District Judge.
______________________ *Honorable Mark E. Fuller, United States Chief District Judge for the Middle District of Alabama, sitting by designation, PER CURIAM:
AFFIRMED. See 11th Cir. R. 36-1.1
1 11th Cir. R. 36-1 provides: When the court determines that any of the following circumstances exist: (a) judgment of the district court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; (b) the evidence in support of a jury verdict is sufficient; (c) the order of an administrative agency is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole; (d) summary judgment, directed verdict, or judgment on the pleadings is supported by the record; (e) judgment has been entered without a reversible error of law; and an opinion would have no precedential value, the judgment or order may be affirmed or enforced without opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
En Xin Wu v. U.S. Attorney General, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/en-xin-wu-v-us-attorney-general-ca11-2005.