E.N. v. State
This text of 512 So. 2d 1159 (E.N. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal questions the propriety of an order denying a motion to suppress.
The record being unclear as to whether the appellant induced error by requesting denial of the motion without evidence being presented or whether the trial court denied the motion to suppress because of the insufficiency of the motion, the judgment of conviction on the nolo plea is reversed with directions to consider the motion to suppress as to its sufficiency, and if found to be sufficient, to then receive evidence in relation thereto.
Reversed with directions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
512 So. 2d 1159, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2339, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 10419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/en-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.