E.M.V.-L. v. M.M.C.

462 So. 2d 23
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 7, 1984
DocketNos. 83-2267, 84-1692
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 462 So. 2d 23 (E.M.V.-L. v. M.M.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
E.M.V.-L. v. M.M.C., 462 So. 2d 23 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the putative father from a final judgment of paternity and from post-trial motions. We affirm and write, having considered and rejected all of appellant’s arguments, only to inform the bench and bar that we join with our companion courts in approving the admissibility of the results of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) test as evidence of blood comparison on the issue of paternity. McQueen v. Stratton, 389 So.2d 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Carlyon v. Weeks, 387 So.2d 465 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). The test is recognized as having substantial probative value in determining paternity. See Bailey v. Richardson, 412 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

GLICKSTEIN, HURLEY and BARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
462 So. 2d 23 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
462 So. 2d 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emv-l-v-mmc-fladistctapp-1984.