Emulsified Asphalt Co. v. City of Columbus
Opinion
The only question involved in this appeal requires a consideration of the evidence which appellee insists is not in the record. Appellant has made no attempt to correct the record so as to overcome appellee’s objection. On the authority of Johnson, Admr., v. Johnson (1901), 156 Ind. 592, 60 N. E. 451; Butt v. Lake Shore, etc., R. Co. (1902), 159 Ind. 490, 65 N. E. 529; and Robinson v. Smith (1917), 64 Ind. App. 119, 115 N. E. 336, we hold the evidence is not in the record.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
167 N.E. 918 (Emulsified Asphalt Co. v. City of Columbus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.