Emulsified Asphalt Co. v. City of Columbus

167 N.E. 918, 89 Ind. App. 718, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 267
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided August 29, 1929·No. No. 13,402.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

McMahan, C. J.

The only question involved in this appeal requires a consideration of the evidence which appellee insists is not in the record. Appellant has made no attempt to correct the record so as to overcome appellee’s objection. On the authority of Johnson, Admr., v. Johnson (1901), 156 Ind. 592, 60 N. E. 451; Butt v. Lake Shore, etc., R. Co. (1902), 159 Ind. 490, 65 N. E. 529; and Robinson v. Smith (1917), 64 Ind. App. 119, 115 N. E. 336, we hold the evidence is not in the record.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Emulsified Asphalt Co. v. City of Columbus, 167 N.E. 918, 89 Ind. App. 718, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 267 (Ind. Ct. App. 1929).

167 N.E. 918 (Emulsified Asphalt Co. v. City of Columbus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clamme v. Hutcherson
29 N.E.2d 320 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1940)
Pahmeier v. Rogers
1 N.E.2d 287 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1936)