Home/Indiana Court of Appeals/Emulsified Asphalt Co. v. City of Columbus

Emulsified Asphalt Co. v. City of Columbus

167 N.E. 918, 89 Ind. App. 718, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 267
CourtIndiana Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 29, 1929
DocketNo. 13,402.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 167 N.E. 918 (Emulsified Asphalt Co. v. City of Columbus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Emulsified Asphalt Co. v. City of Columbus, 167 N.E. 918, 89 Ind. App. 718, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 267 (Ind. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

McMahan, C. J.

The only question involved in this appeal requires a consideration of the evidence which appellee insists is not in the record. Appellant has made no attempt to correct the record so as to overcome appellee’s objection. On the authority of Johnson, Admr., v. Johnson (1901), 156 Ind. 592, 60 N. E. 451; Butt v. Lake Shore, etc., R. Co. (1902), 159 Ind. 490, 65 N. E. 529; and Robinson v. Smith (1917), 64 Ind. App. 119, 115 N. E. 336, we hold the evidence is not in the record.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clamme v. Hutcherson
29 N.E.2d 320 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1940)
Pahmeier v. Rogers
1 N.E.2d 287 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 N.E. 918, 89 Ind. App. 718, 1929 Ind. App. LEXIS 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emulsified-asphalt-co-v-city-of-columbus-indctapp-1929.