Emsig Manufacturing Company v. Merit Plastics, Brofman MacHinery Corp., and Jules Friedman

Second Circuit

Emsig Manufacturing Company v. Merit Plastics, Brofman MacHinery Corp., and Jules Friedman

380 F.2d 736, 154 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 76, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6166

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedMay 31, 1967

Docket30962

StatusPublished

This text of 380 F.2d 736 (Emsig Manufacturing Company v. Merit Plastics, Brofman MacHinery Corp., and Jules Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emsig Manufacturing Company v. Merit Plastics, Brofman MacHinery Corp., and Jules Friedman, 380 F.2d 736, 154 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 76, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6166 (2d Cir. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

380 F.2d 736

EMSIG MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MERIT PLASTICS, Brofman Machinery Corp., and Jules Friedman, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 437.

Docket 30962.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Argued May 2, 1967.

Decided May 31, 1967.

Appeal from a judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, John F. Dooling, Jr., Judge, dismissing plaintiff's claim for patent infringement.

Robert D. Spille, New York City (Mark T. Basseches, John A. Mitchell and Curtis, Morris & Safford, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.

John T. Kelton, New York City (James J. Daley and Watson, Leavenworth, Kelton & Taggart, New York City and Jerome Bauer, Mineola, N. Y., on the brief), for appellees.

Before WATERMAN, FRIENDLY and HAYS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The judgment is affirmed for substantially the reasons stated in Judge Dooling's opinion, D.C., 270 F.Supp. 841.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI