Ems v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 080976b (or.tax 2-5-2009)

Oregon Tax Court

Ems v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 080976b (or.tax 2-5-2009)

DecidedFebruary 5, 2009

DocketTC-MD 080976B.

StatusPublished

This text of Ems v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 080976b (or.tax 2-5-2009) (Ems v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 080976b (or.tax 2-5-2009)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ems v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 080976b (or.tax 2-5-2009), (Or. Super. Ct. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION OF DISMISSAL On November 17, 2008, Defendant filed its Status Report with the court and served a copy on Plaintiff's representative, Meg B. Reinhold. In that report, Defendant submitted a series of questions for Plaintiff. Defendant did not receive a response from Plaintiff.

On January 15, 2009, the court issued a Journal Entry, allowing Plaintiff 14 days from that date to respond to those questions. She was to file her response with the court and with Defendant. The court stated that, if Plaintiff did not respond, Plaintiff's appeal would be dismissed for lack of prosecution. That Journal Entry was served on Defendant and Plaintiff's representative. *Page 2 As of this date, Plaintiff has not responded to Defendant's questions. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiff's appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution.

Dated this ____ day of February 2009.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Mattson on February5, 2009. The Court filed and entered this document on February 5,2009.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION OF DISMISSAL On November 17, 2008, Defendant filed its Status Report with the court and served a copy on Plaintiff's representative, Meg B. Reinhold. In that report, Defendant submitted a series of questions for Plaintiff. Defendant did not receive a response from Plaintiff.

On January 15, 2009, the court issued a Journal Entry, allowing Plaintiff 14 days from that date to respond to those questions. She was to file her response with the court and with Defendant. The court stated that, if Plaintiff did not respond, Plaintiff's appeal would be dismissed for lack of prosecution. That Journal Entry was served on Defendant and Plaintiff's representative. *Page 2 As of this date, Plaintiff has not responded to Defendant's questions. Now, therefore, IT IS THE DECISION OF THIS COURT that Plaintiff's appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution.

Dated this ____ day of February 2009.

If you want to appeal this Decision, file a Complaint in the RegularDivision of the Oregon Tax Court, by mailing to: 1163 State Street,Salem, OR 97301-2563; or by hand delivery to: Fourth Floor, 1241 StateStreet, Salem, OR. Your Complaint must be submitted within 60 days after the date of theDecision or this Decision becomes final and cannot be changed. This document was signed by Magistrate Jeffrey S. Mattson on February5, 2009. The Court filed and entered this document on February 5,2009.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Ems v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 080976b (or.tax 2-5-2009), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ems-v-department-of-revenue-tc-md-080976b-ortax-2-5-2009-ortc-2009.