Emritz Corp. v. Brahms

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Emritz Corp. v. Brahms

233 A.D. 716, 249 N.Y.S. 990

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 716 (Emritz Corp. v. Brahms) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Emritz Corp. v. Brahms, 233 A.D. 716, 249 N.Y.S. 990 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.; O’Malley and Townley, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal of the judgment and a new trial, upon the ground that, in their opinion, the court committed error in charging that the certificate of stock had been placed in escrow; this issue, as well as the credibility.of the witness Singer, being for the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.; O’Malley and Townley, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal of the judgment and a new trial, upon the ground that, in their opinion, the court committed error in charging that the certificate of stock had been placed in escrow; this issue, as well as the credibility.of the witness Singer, being for the jury.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 716, 249 N.Y.S. 990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/emritz-corp-v-brahms-nyappdiv-1931.