Emrit v. Maryland State Bar Ass'n

624 F. App'x 115
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 17, 2015·No. No. 15-2131·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ronald Satish Emrit appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. Emrit v. Md. State Bar Ass’n., No. 1:15-cv-02548-JKB (D.Md. filed Sept. 10, 2015 & entered Sept. 11, 2015); see Shailendra Kumar, P.A. v. Dhanda, 426 Md. 185, 43 A.3d 1029, 1039-41 (2012) (addressing tolling). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions, are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Emrit v. Maryland State Bar Ass'n, 624 F. App'x 115 (4th Cir. 2015).

624 F. App'x 115 (Emrit v. Maryland State Bar Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shailendra Kumar, P.A. v. Dhanda
43 A.3d 1029 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2012)