Employment Security Commission v. Swartz

740 P.2d 401, 1987 Wyo. LEXIS 481
CourtWyoming Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 6, 1987
DocketNo. 87-60
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 740 P.2d 401 (Employment Security Commission v. Swartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wyoming Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Employment Security Commission v. Swartz, 740 P.2d 401, 1987 Wyo. LEXIS 481 (Wyo. 1987).

Opinion

URBIGKIT, Justice.

The Employment Security Commission (ESC) affirmed a hearing examiner’s denial of unemployment benefits for Ann M. Swartz. On appeal, the district court ordered the ESC to pay Ms. Swartz’s attorney’s fees of $112.50 and costs of $.87.1 We will reverse.

It is well established that the courts may not assess attorney’s fees without express statutory or contractual authority. Kvenild v. Taylor, Wyo., 594 P.2d 972, 977 (1979); DeWitt v. Balben, Wyo., 718 P.2d 854, 863 (1986).

The ESC statutes provide no such authority:

“A claimant shall not be assessed fees for proceedings under this act * * * by the commission or the court. The claimant may be represented by counsel * * * [402]*402and the commission or the court shall approve fees for services of counsel * *. Any person violating this subsection shall be fined * * *, imprisoned * * *, or both.” Section 27-3-408(b), W.S.1977.

The intent of the legislature must be gleaned from the words of the statute whenever possible. Wyoming Department of Revenue and Taxation-Excise Tax Division v. First Wyoming Bank, N.A. Kemmerer, Wyo., 718 P.2d 31, 34 (1986). The plain language of the statute must be given effect. Board of County Commissioners of Campbell County v. Ridenour, Wyo., 623 P.2d 1174, 1184, reh. denied 627 P.2d 163 (1981); Committee to Restore Mayor-Council Form of Government v. City of Rawlins, Wyo., 692 P.2d 944, 946 (1984). The statute, intended to protect the claimant against unreasonable attorney’s fees, plainly provides that the court shall “approve” fees. To approve is not to order payment. Cf. § 27-12-604(c), W.S.1977 (1983 Replacement) (amended and reenacted as § 27-14-615, W.S.1977 (1987 Replacement). This court cannot read into the statute words which are not there. Matter of Adoption of Voss, Wyo., 550 P.2d 481, 485 (1976).

Absent some statutory authority, the courts cannot order the ESC to pay claimant’s attorney’s fees.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Stahl
838 P.2d 1193 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
740 P.2d 401, 1987 Wyo. LEXIS 481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/employment-security-commission-v-swartz-wyo-1987.