Employment Division v. Davis
This text of 585 P.2d 769 (Employment Division v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner Employment Division seeks judicial review of a determination by the Employment Appeals Board that the extent of claimant Davis’ disqualification from unemployment benefits is governed by the provisions of ORS 657.215 prior to its amendment by Oregon Laws 1977, § 5 of ch 295. We have ruled contrary to petitioner’s position in Emp. Div. v. Bechtel, 36 Or App 831, 585 P2d 769 (1978).
Claimant cross-petitions for judicial review, arguing that there was no substantial evidence that claimant wilfully made false statements to secure unemployment compensation benefits and that imposition of a penalty under former ORS 657.2151 was inappropriate. Claimant also argues that there was no substantial evidence supporting application of the benefit recovery rules of ORS 657.310 — which relate to misrepresentation in obtaining unemployment benefits— to claimant.
Both of claimant’s contentions are evidentiary. A review of the evidence would benefit neither bench nor bar. Suffice it so say that we have reviewed the portions of the transcript to which we have been directed by the parties and find ample evidence to support both determinations challenged by claimant. See Erickson v. Employment Div., 29 Or App 893, 565 P2d 1181 (1977).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
585 P.2d 769, 36 Or. App. 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/employment-division-v-davis-orctapp-1978.