Employers' Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Commission

70 Colo. 228
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJune 6, 1921
DocketNo. 10,021
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 70 Colo. 228 (Employers' Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Employers' Mutual Insurance v. Industrial Commission, 70 Colo. 228 (Colo. 1921).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Industrial Commission awarded defendant in error, Benke, full compensation ($1,040.) under § 73 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of 1919, for total blindness of the right eye. It is agreed that he lost but ninety per cent of the eye’s sight and retained ten per cent. The commission made a finding of “almost complete loss of vision” in the injured eye, and “That the amount of vision now remaining is of no value from a working standpoint.” Under such finding the award was right. Ind. Com. v. Johnson, 64 Colo. 461, 172 Pac. 422.

The question is one of per cent of disability not of blindness. § 73, par. g. In case of disability under the schedule in said section, the ratio of the award to the maximum should be the ratio of the proved disability to total disability, S. L. 1919, 729, par. g; and disability in the statute means disability to work. When, therefore, an eye is rendered of no use in work it is totally disabled and the award should be the maximum.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Teller, sitting for Mr. Chief Justice Scott, and Mr. Justice Whitford concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Great American Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission
162 P.2d 413 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1945)
Downs v. Industrial Commission
121 P.2d 489 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1942)
Byouk v. Industrial Commission
105 P.2d 1087 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1940)
Platt-Rogers, Inc. v. Industrial Commission
74 P.2d 673 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1937)
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Commission
46 P.2d 752 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1935)
The Studebaker Corp. v. Anderson
183 N.E. 408 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1932)
McDonald v. Treasurer of State of Idaho
16 P.2d 988 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1932)
New York Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Commission
281 P. 740 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1929)
Sakamoto v. Kemmerer Coal Co.
255 P. 356 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1927)
Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Richmond
284 S.W. 698 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1926)
Northern Indiana Power Co. v. Hawkins
146 N.E. 879 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1925)
Kramer v. Tone Bros.
198 Iowa 1140 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1924)
Industrial Commission v. State Insurance Compensation Fund
203 P. 215 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
70 Colo. 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/employers-mutual-insurance-v-industrial-commission-colo-1921.