Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. North American Specialty Flooring, Inc.

E.D. California

Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. North American Specialty Flooring, Inc.

DecidedAugust 20, 2019

Docket1:19-cv-00544

StatusUnknown

This text of Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. North American Specialty Flooring, Inc. (Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. North American Specialty Flooring, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. North American Specialty Flooring, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY Case No.: 1:19-cv-00544 DAD JLT COMPANY, et al., 12 ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION AS TO Plaintiffs, NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY, 13 ROY’S FLOORING, INC. AND JOSE ROY v. GARCIA 14 NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY 15 FLOORING, INC., et al.,

Defendants. 16

17 The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action as to Navigators Insurance Company, Roy’s 18 Flooring, Inc. and Jose Roy Garcia individually and formerly doing business as Roy’s Flooring. (Doc. 19 23 at 3) The stipulation relies upon Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, which permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action 20 without a court order “by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” 21 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the 22 stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 23 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as to these 24 defendants only. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED.

27 Dated: August 20, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY Case No.: 1:19-cv-00544 DAD JLT COMPANY, et al., 12 ORDER CLOSING THE ACTION AS TO Plaintiffs, NAVIGATORS INSURANCE COMPANY, 13 ROY’S FLOORING, INC. AND JOSE ROY v. GARCIA 14 NORTH AMERICAN SPECIALTY 15 FLOORING, INC., et al.,

Defendants. 16

17 The parties have stipulated to dismiss the action as to Navigators Insurance Company, Roy’s 18 Flooring, Inc. and Jose Roy Garcia individually and formerly doing business as Roy’s Flooring. (Doc. 19 23 at 3) The stipulation relies upon Fed.R.Civ.P. 41, which permits the plaintiff to dismiss an action 20 without a court order “by filing . . . a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.” 21 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Because all parties who have appeared in the action signed the 22 stipulation, it “automatically terminate[d] the action.” Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 23 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to close this action as to these 24 defendants only. 25 26 IT IS SO ORDERED.

27 Dated: August 20, 2019 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. North American Specialty Flooring, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/employers-mutual-casualty-co-v-north-american-specialty-flooring-inc-caed-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack