Employers Insurance of Wassau v. Tri Star Building Corp.

133 A.D.2d 664, 519 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51704
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 13, 1987
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 133 A.D.2d 664 (Employers Insurance of Wassau v. Tri Star Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Employers Insurance of Wassau v. Tri Star Building Corp., 133 A.D.2d 664, 519 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51704 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

In an action to recover an alleged balance of earned insurance premiums on several insurance policies issued by the plaintiff to the defendant, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Ruskin, J.), dated January 14, 1986, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denied the defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and directed the entry of judgment for the plaintiff in the principal sum of $21,109.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In contrast to the plaintiff’s detailed specifications and evidentiary support of its assertions on its motion for summary judgment, the defendant’s papers consist of conclusory, general charges and do not document, or in any respect provide, any instances of the alleged misclassifications, misratings or "abusive audit practices in violation of the regulations of the New York State Insurance Department”.

Although, following the commencement of the litigation, the defendant sent a written complaint to the New York State Insurance Department to the effect that the earned premium claimed by the plaintiff based on the worksheets does not agree with the defendant’s payroll records, the defendant has not made any effort to document that claim with specifications and copies of its records showing any alleged discrepancies vis[665]*665á-vis the plaintiffs records. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Brown and Niehoff, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Brooklyn Barber Beauty Equipment Co.
191 Misc. 2d 1 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
133 A.D.2d 664, 519 N.Y.S.2d 835, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/employers-insurance-of-wassau-v-tri-star-building-corp-nyappdiv-1987.