Employers Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Firemen's Fund Insurance

55 A.D.2d 888, 391 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10106
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 27, 1977
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 55 A.D.2d 888 (Employers Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Firemen's Fund Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Employers Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. Firemen's Fund Insurance, 55 A.D.2d 888, 391 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered March 5, 1976, granting summary judgment to the plaintiff and declaring in its . favor, unanimously affirmed, with $60 costs and disbursements to respondent. An automobile owned by the insured was involved in an accident, and after a decision on liability it was settled for a substantial sum. The plaintiff insurance company defended the insured and then sued to recover the amount expended in settlement and counsel fees. The defendant insurance company had originally insured the automobile involved and contends that it was off the risk at the time of the accident. The plaintiff contends that, while it had an insurance policy for the insured at the time of the accident, it did not cover the specific automobile involved. At issue is an interpretation of section 313 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law. If the defendant insurance company had terminated its coverage so that it would have been [889]*889superseded. by the plaintiffs insurance contract, there would have to be either notification by the commissioner to the defendant or the filing of a notice by the defendant of termination of coverage (Form FS-4) with the Department of Motor Vehicles. There having been neither, and the plaintiff contending that it had not substituted for the defendant in the coverage of this vehicle, the liability is that of the defendant. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Birns, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Employers Commercial Union Insurance v. Firemen's Fund Insurance
384 N.E.2d 668 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.D.2d 888, 391 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/employers-commercial-union-insurance-co-v-firemens-fund-insurance-nyappdiv-1977.