Employees' Mutual Association of Chicago v. National Labor Relations Board

105 F.2d 1016, 4 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 791, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2434
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
DecidedOctober 10, 1938
DocketNos. 6762, 6769
StatusPublished

This text of 105 F.2d 1016 (Employees' Mutual Association of Chicago v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Employees' Mutual Association of Chicago v. National Labor Relations Board, 105 F.2d 1016, 4 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 791, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2434 (7th Cir. 1938).

Opinion

PER^ CURIAM.

Petitioners’ applications for an injunction pending the disposition of this appeal must be denied upon the authority of In the Matter of the Petition of the National Labor Relations Board for a Writ of Prohibition and for a Writ of Mandamus, decided by the Supreme Court May 31, 1938, 304 U.S. 486, 58 S.Ct. 1001, 82 L.Ed. 1482, and New York Handkerchief Mfg. Company v. National Labor Relations [1017]*1017Board, 7 Cir., 97 F.2d 1010, decided by this court May 27, 1938. While the facts, and in some respects the issues are different, we are convinced that the Supreme Court decision is applicable and governs.

The order denying the applications for injunction will be entered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re the National Labor Relations Board
304 U.S. 486 (Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 F.2d 1016, 4 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 791, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2434, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/employees-mutual-association-of-chicago-v-national-labor-relations-board-ca7-1938.