Employee Funding of America, LLC v. Clayton Clark; Clark, Love & Hutson, GP; Peter Flowers; Meyers & Flowers LLC
This text of Employee Funding of America, LLC v. Clayton Clark; Clark, Love & Hutson, GP; Peter Flowers; Meyers & Flowers LLC (Employee Funding of America, LLC v. Clayton Clark; Clark, Love & Hutson, GP; Peter Flowers; Meyers & Flowers LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-23-00391-CV
EMPLOYEE FUNDING OF AMERICA, LLC, APPELLANT
V.
CLAYTON CLARK; CLARK, LOVE & HUTSON, GP; PETER FLOWERS; AND MEYERS & FLOWERS LLC, APPELLEES
On Appeal from the 200th District Court Travis County, Texas Trial Court No. D-1-GN-22-006405, Honorable Daniella DeSeta Lyttle, Presiding
June 5, 2025 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Employee Funding of America, LLC, appeals from the trial court’s Final
Judgment.1 We previously abated the appeal after receiving notice of Appellant’s
bankruptcy proceedings filed in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern
District of Florida. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.1, 8.2. On March 5, 2025, the parties informed
1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the
Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. the Court that the bankruptcy stay had been lifted and that the parties were engaged in
settlement negotiations.
Now pending before the Court is Appellant’s unopposed motion seeking to
voluntarily dismiss the appeal. The Court finds that the motion complies with the
requirements of Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.1(a)(1) and that granting the motion will
not prevent any party from seeking relief to which it would otherwise be entitled. As no
decision of the Court has been delivered to date, we reinstate the appeal, grant
Appellant’s motion, and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3, 42.1(a)(1). As
requested by the unopposed motion, costs shall be taxed against the parties who incurred
them. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). No motion for rehearing will be entertained and our
mandate will issue forthwith.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Employee Funding of America, LLC v. Clayton Clark; Clark, Love & Hutson, GP; Peter Flowers; Meyers & Flowers LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/employee-funding-of-america-llc-v-clayton-clark-clark-love-hutson-texapp-2025.