Employee Benefit Claims, Inc. v. Diaz

478 So. 2d 379, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2350, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16296
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 15, 1985·No. No. 84-2259·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Employee Benefit Claims, Inc. appeals an order denying its motion for relief from judgment and affirming the final judgment entered following default judgment and non-jury trial on the issue of damages. It is well settled that a demand for jury trial entitles the demanding party to a jury determination as to damages, even after entry of a default. Air Unlimited, Inc. v. Volare Air, Inc., 428 So.2d 294 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Ansel v. Kizer, 428 So.2d 671 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Saunders v. Saunders, 346 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Accordingly, we hold that the trial court erred in conducting a non-jury trial, and we remand for a jury trial solely on the issue of damages. We find no merit in the other points raised.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded with directions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Employee Benefit Claims, Inc. v. Diaz, 478 So. 2d 379, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2350, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 16296 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

478 So. 2d 379 (Employee Benefit Claims, Inc. v. Diaz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Szucs v. QUALICO DEVELOPMENT, INC.
893 So. 2d 708 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Curbelo v. Ullman
571 So. 2d 443 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)