Empire State Pickling Co. v. Pfister

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Empire State Pickling Co. v. Pfister

145 N.Y.S. 1122

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 14, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 145 N.Y.S. 1122 (Empire State Pickling Co. v. Pfister) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Empire State Pickling Co. v. Pfister, 145 N.Y.S. 1122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order (80 Misc. Rep. 162, 141 N. Y. Supp. 817) affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a new motion to open the default as a matter of favor, on showing merits. Plaintiff’s practice was regular.

KRUSE, P. J., dissents, upon the following grounds: First, that the notice of trial is defective and insufficient as to form and manner of service; second, that in any event judicial discretion requires the opening of the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Order (80 Misc. Rep. 162, 141 N. Y. Supp. 817) affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements, without prejudice to a new motion to open the default as a matter of favor, on showing merits. Plaintiff’s practice was regular.

KRUSE, P. J., dissents, upon the following grounds: First, that the notice of trial is defective and insufficient as to form and manner of service; second, that in any event judicial discretion requires the opening of the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

145 N.Y.S. 1122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/empire-state-pickling-co-v-pfister-nyappdiv-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack