Empire State Life Assurance Society v. Kasprzak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Empire State Life Assurance Society v. Kasprzak

243 A.D. 678

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that there was prejudicial error in admitting the two contradictory statements on collateral matters made by the witness Kasprzak. (The judgment is for defendant in an action to rescind two life insurance policies. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and a new trial on the ground that there was prejudicial error in admitting the two contradictory statements on collateral matters made by the witness Kasprzak. (The judgment is for defendant in an action to rescind two life insurance policies. The order denies a motion for a new trial on the minutes.)

Empire State Life Assurance Society v. Kasprzak, 243 A.D. 678 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 678 (Empire State Life Assurance Society v. Kasprzak) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.