Empire Securities Corporation v. Pontious

123 So. 767, 98 Fla. 380
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 1, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 123 So. 767 (Empire Securities Corporation v. Pontious) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Empire Securities Corporation v. Pontious, 123 So. 767, 98 Fla. 380 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

Campbell, Circuit Judge:

This is a companion case, and similar in every respect to the case of Isaac T. Cook and George E. Ricker v. W. H. Pontious, decided at this term, wherein the decree of the court below was reversed with directions. See 98 Fla. 373, 122 So. R. 765.

Under the opinion above mentioned, the decree of the court below in this ease will be reversed, with directions for *381 the chancellor to dismiss the bill of complaint, without prejudice to the rights of the complainant to file another bill of complaint, should the respondents named as owners of the former record title to the property described in the present bill of complaint, or those claiming under them, ever assert claims or interests under such former record title derogatory to the title of complainants under the drainage tax deed.

Reversed with directions.

Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tangeman v. Sjoblom
130 So. 603 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
123 So. 767, 98 Fla. 380, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/empire-securities-corporation-v-pontious-fla-1929.