Empire Mutual Insurance v. Calzone
This text of 48 A.D.2d 787 (Empire Mutual Insurance v. Calzone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for reargument granted and the order of this court entered on January 30, 1975 (47 AD2d 598) is recalled and vacated and, upon reargument, the order of the Supreme Court, New York County, entered on May 22, 1974, which denied petitioner’s motion for a stay of arbitration, is unanimously reversed, on the law, and the motion granted. Appellant shall recover of respondents $40 costs and disbursements of the appeal. The claimant seeks arbitration pursuant to the terms of the New York automobile accident indemnification endorsement contained in the subject policy issued by petitioner. However, since the accident occurred in the State of Florida, the endorsement is not applicable. (Matter of Sentry Ins. Co. (Amsel), 36 NY2d 291.) Concur—Markewich, J. P., Lupiano, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Yesawich, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 A.D.2d 787, 381 N.Y.S.2d 230, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/empire-mutual-insurance-v-calzone-nyappdiv-1975.