Empire Life Insurance v. Perkins
This text of 90 S.E. 981 (Empire Life Insurance v. Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The rulings made by this court in this ease when it was previously before us for review (Perkins v. Empire Life Ins. Co., 17 Ga. App. 658, 87 S. E. 1094), whether right or wrong, have become the law of the ease, and we are bound by them. Southern Bell Tel. Co. v. Glawson, 140 Ga. 507 (79 S. E. 136). Under the rulings there made, [78]*78the trial judge did not err in excluding the testimony of the secretary of the defendant insurance company as set forth in the bill of exceptions, or in thereafter directing a verdict for the plaintiff. It appearing, however, that there was an error of computation as to the specific amount of the verdict directed, to the extent of $306.29 in excess of what should have been directed, it is ordered that this sum be written off from the verdict and judgment.
Judgment affirmed, with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 S.E. 981, 19 Ga. App. 77, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 52, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/empire-life-insurance-v-perkins-gactapp-1916.