Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Fraction

Missouri Court of Appeals

Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Fraction

515 S.W.3d 820, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 685, 2017 WL 405798

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 31, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104367

StatusPublished

This text of 515 S.W.3d 820 (Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Fraction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Fraction, 515 S.W.3d 820, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 685, 2017 WL 405798 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Wendi Fraction (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s declaratory judgment, which declared Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“Empire”) had no duty to provide Appellant with coverage under its excess policy for personal injury claims arising from an automobile accident during a police chase between Appellant’s brother, Melvin [821]*821Fraction (“Brother”) and Officer Travis Rule (“Officer”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Wendi Fraction (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s declaratory judgment, which declared Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company (“Empire”) had no duty to provide Appellant with coverage under its excess policy for personal injury claims arising from an automobile accident during a police chase between Appellant’s brother, Melvin [821]*821Fraction (“Brother”) and Officer Travis Rule (“Officer”). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

515 S.W.3d 820, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 685, 2017 WL 405798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/empire-fire-marine-insurance-co-v-fraction-moctapp-2017.