Empire Engineering Co. v. White, Gratwick & Mitchell, Inc.

271 U.S. 641, 46 S. Ct. 473
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 19, 1926
DocketNo. 662
StatusPublished

This text of 271 U.S. 641 (Empire Engineering Co. v. White, Gratwick & Mitchell, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Empire Engineering Co. v. White, Gratwick & Mitchell, Inc., 271 U.S. 641, 46 S. Ct. 473 (1926).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of California Powder Works v. Davis & Co., 151 U. S. 389; Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 469, 470; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View R. R. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Yazoo & Mississippi Valley R. R. Co. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Municipal Securities Corporation v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63, 69; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

California Powder Works v. Davis
151 U.S. 389 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Brewer
231 U.S. 245 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co.
244 U.S. 300 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas City
246 U.S. 63 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Bilby v. Stewart
246 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird
248 U.S. 268 (Supreme Court, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 U.S. 641, 46 S. Ct. 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/empire-engineering-co-v-white-gratwick-mitchell-inc-scotus-1926.