Home/Supreme Court/Empire Engineering Co. v. White, Gratwick & Mitchell, Inc.

Empire Engineering Co. v. White, Gratwick & Mitchell, Inc.

271 U.S. 641, 46 S. Ct. 473
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided April 19, 1926·No. No. 662·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of California Powder Works v. Davis & Co., 151 U. S. 389; Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Shannon, 223 U. S. 469, 470; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View R. R. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 599; Yazoo & Mississippi Valley R. R. Co. v. Brewer, 231 U. S. 245, 249; Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co., 244 U. S. 300, 303; Municipal Securities Corporation v. Kansas City, 246 U. S. 63, 69; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257; Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268, 271.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Empire Engineering Co. v. White, Gratwick & Mitchell, Inc., 271 U.S. 641, 46 S. Ct. 473 (1926).

271 U.S. 641 (Empire Engineering Co. v. White, Gratwick & Mitchell, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

California Powder Works v. Davis
151 U.S. 389 (Supreme Court, 1894)
Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 596 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Brewer
231 U.S. 245 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Cuyahoga River Power Co. v. Northern Realty Co.
244 U.S. 300 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas City
246 U.S. 63 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Bilby v. Stewart
246 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1918)
Farson, Son & Co. v. Bird
248 U.S. 268 (Supreme Court, 1919)