Empire Cotton Oil Co. v. Maxwell

91 S.E. 792, 19 Ga. App. 493, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 190
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 16, 1917·No. 7905·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

1. “It is a good defense to an action on a negotiable promissory note, under seal, in the hands of the original payee," that it was executed without any lawful consideration.” Lacey v. Hutchinson, 5 Ga. App. 865 (64 S. E. 105); Saul v. Southern Seating &c. Co., 6 Ga. App. 843, 847 (65 S. E. 1065); Toller v. Hewitt, 12 Ga. App. 496 (77 S. E. 650); Strickland v. Farmers Supply Co., 14 Ga. App. 661, 664 (82 S. E. 161); Seawright v. Dickson, 16 Ga. App. 436, 442 (85 S. E. 625).

2. The defense filed was sufficient to withstand the general demurrer of plaintiff, and the trial judge did not err in refusing to strike the plea.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Empire Cotton Oil Co. v. Maxwell, 91 S.E. 792, 19 Ga. App. 493, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 190 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

91 S.E. 792 (Empire Cotton Oil Co. v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Roberts v. Farmer
193 S.E.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Mooradian v. Jackson
131 S.E.2d 116 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Krueger v. Simmons
95 S.E. 718 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)