Empire Cotton Oil Co. v. Maxwell

91 S.E. 792, 19 Ga. App. 493, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 190
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 16, 1917
Docket7905
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 91 S.E. 792 (Empire Cotton Oil Co. v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Empire Cotton Oil Co. v. Maxwell, 91 S.E. 792, 19 Ga. App. 493, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 190 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

1. “It is a good defense to an action on a negotiable promissory note, under seal, in the hands of the original payee," that it was executed without any lawful consideration.” Lacey v. Hutchinson, 5 Ga. App. 865 (64 S. E. 105); Saul v. Southern Seating &c. Co., 6 Ga. App. 843, 847 (65 S. E. 1065); Toller v. Hewitt, 12 Ga. App. 496 (77 S. E. 650); Strickland v. Farmers Supply Co., 14 Ga. App. 661, 664 (82 S. E. 161); Seawright v. Dickson, 16 Ga. App. 436, 442 (85 S. E. 625).

2. The defense filed was sufficient to withstand the general demurrer of plaintiff, and the trial judge did not err in refusing to strike the plea.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. Farmer
193 S.E.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Mooradian v. Jackson
131 S.E.2d 116 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
Krueger v. Simmons
95 S.E. 718 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 792, 19 Ga. App. 493, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/empire-cotton-oil-co-v-maxwell-gactapp-1917.