Empire Center for New York State Policy v. New York City Police Pension Fund

88 A.D.3d 520, 930 N.Y.2d 576
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 18, 2011·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[521] The petition was properly denied. In Matter of New York Veteran Police Assn. v New York City Police Dept. Art. I Pension Fund (61 NY2d 659 [1983]), the Court of Appeals held that Public Officers Law § 89 (7) exempts from disclosure both the names and addresses of retirees of the New York City Police Department receiving pensions and annuities. Thus, respondent correctly denied petitioner’s FOIL request seeking the names of its retired members. Petitioner offers no persuasive argument distinguishing its FOIL request from that in Matter of New York Veteran Police Assn. Concur — Gonzalez, PJ., Tom, Friedman, Catterson and Richter, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Empire Center for New York State Policy v. New York City Police Pension Fund, 88 A.D.3d 520, 930 N.Y.2d 576 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

88 A.D.3d 520 (Empire Center for New York State Policy v. New York City Police Pension Fund) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Empire Center for New York State Policy v. Teachers' Retirement System
103 A.D.3d 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Empire Center for New York State Policy v. New York State Teachers' Retirement System
103 A.D.3d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)